NYTimes Deceit: By Rob Hollander
A letter from community activist Rob Hollander:
Friends and neighbors,
In case you thought the NYTimes practiced journalism:
In quoting a developer defending the need for progress, the NYTimes carefully hides the fact that he demolished a historical townhouse
To assess his quote, the reader needs to know that he demolished it himself for himself, not for the relevance of the city. Was he overwhelmed with petitions to "please demolish this 1825 townhouse so New York will be relevant"? Commercial developers demolish buildings with no regard for the relevance of the city, for its past or its future. The comment about relevance is a post factum excuse to pour perfume over his waste. He demolished the building for himself.
Meanwhile, the NYTimes turns him into a spokesperson for "the relevance of the city" by hiding his personal financial interest. Is this journalism, objective reporting, accuracy, information? It's journalistic fraud, and plain deceit. That's the New York Times I know. It's the Times acting as lickspittle for a developer. If you didn't already know this about the Times, now you do.
Am I the only person disgusted by it?